ERROR ANALYSIS IN USING AUXILIARY CAPITAL IN WRITING (CASE STUDY OF SEMESTER III ENGLISH LITERATURE STUDENTS)
Abstract
This study aims to determine and identify the understanding of students in Modal Auxiliary to improve students' abilities. This research was conducted using qualitative methods. The purpose of this study is to describe the current problems related to teaching and learning of Modal Auxiliary (Auxiliary Capital) and the problem of using Auxiliary Modal by the Third semester students of English Literature, UMI Makassar. The results showed that the writing test that had been given to students was based on the problem "What mistakes did students make in using Auxiliary Modal?" and "what factors hinder students from using auxiliary capital?" When the data has been coded, and errors have been identified, the researcher classifies errors into two types, namely word crime (with a frequency of 66%), misformation (with a frequency of 34%), and the inhibiting factor, namely Students Thinking that Auxiliary Capital is difficult and Students think that Auxiliary capital is astounding. It can be said that there are errors made using certain systems, such as wrong tongue, wrong memorization, and other physical factors as well as errors made by students based on misunderstanding reasons, because students do not know, or do not understand the structure of the language.
References
Beaumont, & Granger, C. 1989. The Heinemann English Grammar Intermediate Reference and Practice Book. London: Heinemann.
Bhatia, H. S, MA 1995. Comprehensive High School English Grammar and Composition. Delhi: Book Palace.
Brown, HD1980. The Principles of Language Learning and Teaching. New Jersey: Prentice Hall, Inc.
Cahyaningrum, Danik. 2014. Error Analysis on The Use of To Be as Auxiliary And Linking Verb In The Students' Recount Text. Journal of English Language Teaching 3: State University of Semarang, Indonesia.
Collins, Harper. 1994. Grammar. Http://www. Grammar.com. Accessed on march 13th, 2018s
Creswell W. John. 2013. Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Approach Research Design. Yogyakarta: Student Library.
Harcourt, Braces. Reprint: Dover Books on Language, 2004.
Quick, R, Greenbaum, S. Leech, G. and Svartvik J 1985. A comprehensive grammar of the grammar language. London: Longman
Sapir, E. (1921). language. An introduction to the study of speech. New York.
Saryono (2010). Health Research Methodology A Practical Guide to
Beginner.Yogyakarta: Scholarly Press Partners.
Sibali. 1992. Modality in English, Makassar Literature Faculty Thesis: UNHAS.
Thompson, Paul. 2002. Language, Modal Verbs in Academic Writing: on Teaching and Language Corpora.
Todd. 1985. Grammar. Http://www.grammar.com. Accessed on March 13th,2018.
Züll, C. (2016). Open-ended questions. GESIS Survey Guidelines, 3.